Students, please view the “Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment” in the Student Center. Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center.Assignment 1:Argument MappingDue Week 3 and worth 150 pointsWrite a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:(Note:Refer to Demonstration Exercise 3 located at the end of Chapter 1 for criteria 1-3.)Create an argument map based on the influence diagram presented in Case 1.3 and complete all the criteria provided in the exercise, beginning with this claim: âThe U.S. should return to the 55- mph speed limit in order to conserve fuel and save lives.â Include in the map as many warrants, backings, objections, and rebuttals as possible.Assume that the original qualifier wascertainly;indicate whether the qualifier changes as we move from a simple, static, uncontested argument to a complex, dynamic and contested argument.(Note:Refer to Demonstration Exercise 3 located at the end of Chapter 8 for criterion 4.)Apply the argument mapping procedures presented in Chapter 8 to analyze the pros and cons (or strengths and weaknesses) of the recommendations that the United States shouldnotintervene in the Balkans.(Note:Refer to Demonstration Exercise 4 located at the end of Chapter 8 for criteria 5-7.)Write a one (1) page analysis that uses critical thinking to assess the overall plausibility of the claim: âThe conflict in Bosnia is somebody elseâs trouble. The U.S. should not intervene militarily.âComplete an argument map to illustrate your analysis.Include at least two (2) peer-reviewed references (no more than five [5] years old) from material outside the textbook to support your views regarding the proposed U.S. response to the conflict in Bosnia.Note:Appropriate peer-reviewed references include scholarly articles and governmental Websites. Do not use open source Websites such as Wikipedia, Sparknotes.com, Ask.com, and similar Websites are not acceptable resources.