Protection of Human Rights

1: Rosa Week 10 Assignment

Order Description

Read the following paper and answer the following:
• Describe ethical considerations and your plan to protect human rights.
• Limitation of Proposed Study
• Implications for nursing Practice

2: nursing project

Order Description

Identify a project currently or previously conducted at your place of employment. • Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the project’s qualitative and quantitative design and its impact of practice. • Examples of work related projects are: – Radification or reduction by 53.4% in employees exposures to airborne infections with the use of a high-powered negative air flow system. -Medication error reductions by 75% with new EMR and the strategified high risk warranting system -Increased nursing retention and satisfaction with the mentor/mentee program for professional career advancement. • Do not mention of the name of your organization. • Support your statements with at least two peer-reviewed articles, be less than five (5) years old.

3:Policy

As presented by Group #5, the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (MHPAEA) is a federal law that generally prevents group health plans and health insurance issuers that provide mental health or substance use disorder (MH/SUD) benefits from imposing less favorable benefit limitations on those benefits than on medical/surgical benefits. MHPAEA originally applied to group health plans and group health insurance coverage and was amended by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively referred to as the “Affordable Care Act”) to also apply to individual health insurance coverage. The ACA required both private insurance and state-subsidized Medicaid plans to offer mental health and substance-abuse treatment as an essential benefit—a core safeguard for parity. However, the GOP health bill to repeal ACA earlier this year stated to remove a requirement set forth in the ACA that mandated Medicaid to cover basic mental and behavioral (including substance-related) health services. If the bill would have passed, the burden of mental health care would fall largely on states and individuals. How would the removal of mandated Medicaid coverage on basic mental and behavioral (including substance-related) health services impact other public sectors, including medical health care, public assistance, public housing, child welfare, criminal justice? Will the needs for these services increase? In other words, if the mandated Medicaid coverage on basic mental and behavioral (including substance-related) health services is removed, will public sectors such as medical health care, public assistance, public housing, child welfare, criminal justice see more people enter their services? Why or why not? Please explain the impacts on each of these public sectors. One of the rationals to repeal ACA is to cut federal spending. Do you think in the long run, removing coverage on Mental Health and Substance Use Treatment will save money? Your paper should be short, and no more than 3 pages in length (Double-Spaced). Be sure to enclose direct quotations in quotation marks, properly cite sources used in APA style, write well, avoiding grammatical and spelling errors, and proofread your paper before submitting it.

human rights