Nursing and Midwifery

post contains two assignments

NURS 3044: Research Methodology

• State your developed research question including the Population, Intervention, Comparison (if relevant) and Outcomes (PICO) OR Population, Intervention/Issue, Outcomes (PIO). Note: the question must relate to the relevant nursing or midwifery scenario.
• Describe each element of the research question using the relevant PICO or PIO framework.
• Articulate the significance of the research question. In other words, provide an explanation using appropriate references as to why this research question is important to different aspects of nursing and/or midwifery practice*
*Different aspects to consider may include: 1) clinical practice; 2) research, 3) education; 4) policy development

Keywords and Combinations (200 words equivalent):
List the keywords relevant to your research question (with the use of truncation, abbreviations and wildcards where appropriate)

List the key word combinations (using appropriate Boolean operators) you used to search online Health databases for relevant research articles.
Search Strategy:
List the database(s) where you used the key words and their combinations to search for relevant research articles to answer your research question:

Results- The Peer Reviewed Articles (700 words equivalent –this is a reflection of the effort required)

Note: All chosen articles must be primary research ie: where the authors have identified an issue/problem and collected information/measurements and presented this information. A primary research article is not a: systematic review, integrated review, clinical guideline, editorial or commentary.

List the 4 relevant research articles you found using UniSA Harvard referencing style.
1.
2.
3.
4.

Use the 4 research articles you found to complete one (or more) of the following tables as relevant to your selected articles.

*Please delete irrelevant tables before submission of this assignment.
Table 1. Qualitative studies
Article Reference
(authors and publication date) Methodology
(ie: ethnography, phenomenology,) Population
(how many participants, age, gender, disease, etc) Issue
(what was being studied) Context
(what was the study setting?) Outcome
(what were the main findings in relation to the issue?)
1
2
3
4

Table 1. Experimental quantitative studies
Article Reference
(authors and publication date) Study Design
(ie: cohort, RCT,) Population
(how many participants, age, gender, disease, etc) Intervention (what was being implemented) Comparison
(what was the intervention compared against?) Outcome
(What are the consequences from the intervention?)
1
2
3
4

Table 1. Observational quantitative studies
Article Reference
(authors and publication date) Study Design
(ie: cohort) Population
(how many participants, age, gender, disease, etc) Issue
(e.g. the thing that is being measured) Context
(what was the study setting?) Outcome
( (What was reported in relation to what was measured)
1
2
3
4

Discussion (1000 words)

Using the critiquing skills acquired in Research Methodology-Assignment 1, choose the BEST and WORST articles from the 4 relevant articles in terms of their methodological quality and explain why they are the best and worst.

References
[Please use correct UniSA Harvard Referencing]

2:Missouri Farmers Association

Order Description

Is a farmer a merchant under the UCC?
Read the following set of facts. This set of facts is to be addressed using the relevant sections of the UCC that you have read and are familiar with thus far in the course. Your response should not be more than four (4) pages, double spaced and should focus on why and how the relevant sections of the UCC will guide the parties to a conclusion, and which party should prevail under the UCC.
=

Is a farmer a merchant under the UCC?
Rush Johnson Farms, Inc., (Johnson) is thinking of filing a lawsuit against Missouri Farmers Association, Inc., (MFA) for $4,094.60, which Johnson claimed to be the balance due for soybeans sold to MFA. MFA said it withheld the amount on the ground that Johnson had entered into a contract to deliver 6,000 bushels of beans and had failed to deliver the entire amount and the sum MFA withheld represented damages to MFA for the shortage.
When Johnson was getting ready to sell his 1972 crop in 1973, he stated he had checked with a number of elevators to determine the market price of soybeans. He called the MFA elevator at Salisbury and requested he be notified when beans reached $4.00 a bushel. On January 2, 1973, the secretary at the elevator called Johnson and told him beans had reached $4.02 per bushel. He stated he agreed to sell his crop at the $4.02 figure and estimated he would have from 5,000 to 6,000 bushels. The elevator secretary has told everyone that her understanding was the agreement was to sell the definite quantity of 6,000 bushels.
Within a few days after January 2, the secretary mailed Johnson a written contract calling for the sale of 6,000 bushels of soybeans at $4.02 per bushel. Johnson stated he received the contract and was excited, but he did not contact the elevator about any difference in understanding of number of bushels sold. Instead he threw the contract away.
Johnson contended the contract was not for a definite quantity of beans. Further, Johnson argued the contract was oral and under sections of the UCC could not be proven because it involved more than $500 and was not in writing signed by him. As a result, he was not obligated to the entire 6,000 bushels. MFA countered that Johnson was a “merchant” within the UCC definition and therefore the specifics of the oral representation would be admissible.
The underlying issues are pretty simple here – does the UCC apply to this transaction? Did there need to be a contract in writing for either party to prevail? If not, how would the UCC dictate how the disposition of this case would be? Remember, the UCC is written to address circumstances such as these where there is either no writing, or there is an incomplete writing.

Farmers Association