post has three assignments
1:Pick, and write about, an International Event (e.g., Olympics). Your essay should address the following in order to describe and illustrate the event in the context of a globalized world:
1. What/who are the major players, and how are they related? Explain the dynamics of the event in a globalized context.
2. Explain in your essay how globalization plays a role into the occurrence, operation and publicity of the event.
3. Explain how the event plays a significant role in the globalized world today.
4. How do domestic and international communities gain and/or lose from the event. Express your answer from an economic, cultural and social perspective.
explain how various historical events (events in the past that led to globalization as we see today) have played a role in the formation of the event.
2: Problem Solving/Policy
Order Description
Problem Solving/Policy Implementation: Assignment 4
**THE SOLUTION IS CREATING A PROGRAM IN THE MILITARY THAT ALLOWS THESE PEOPLE TO BE ASSIGNED A CASE MANAGER THAT HELPS THEM WITH THE FOLLOWING NEEDS FOR UP TO 18 MONTHS AFTER LEAVING THE MILITARY:
– RESOURCES FOR HOUSING
– RESOURCES FOR BUDGETING
– RESOURCES FOR PURSUING EDUCATION
– RESOURCES FOR EMPLOYMENT
– RESOURCES FOR HEALTHCARE
**Keep in mind that there are many resources availible for these problems, but the military tells these people about them in a 5 day course, which is unrealistic and overwhelming for the military personnel.
This assignment is problem solution paper in which students will explore a problem facing military members, veterans, or their families and provide a solution. The paper should be between 8 and 10 pages. Written paper must include citations according to APA style. The paper must use 12-point font, Times New Roman, double-spaced.
Content (70%): Requirements:
1. Provide a literature review of the problem that clearly shows how your new problem will solve it (two to three pages). **Identify the problem, discuss what’s going on, the introduce the solution briefly
2. Discuss at least one current policy or program that addresses this problem and why it is or is not effective (one to two pages).
3. Examine issues of diversity, gender, race, and ethics in terms of the problem and possible solutions (one page).
4. From the literature review, develop a list of criteria that a new program or policy must address (one page).
5. Provide a solution either a new policy or program that would meet the criteria established in prompt 3 (one page).
6. Critically analyze the solution (one to two pages). **How will the solution be evaluated? How will we get the leadership to support this solution?
7. Discuss future areas for research or changes that need to be considered (half a page).
8. Included citations from scholarly sources (minimum of 10 sources—three must be readings that are not contained in the syllabus.) BOLD THE OUTSIDE READINGS IN THE REFERENCE LIST.
Grading Scale:
Outstanding
a. Exceeded the requirements of the assignment.
b. Main Points were clear and demonstrated a robust understanding of the course materials.
c. Evidence supported the analysis and was varied, specific, and unambiguous.
d. Ideas presented in a logical and coherent fashion with no effort required by the reader.
e. Showed significant personal insights and awareness and related those to future social work practice.
3: Hegel and Marx
Order Description
Topic:
Hegel argues that the family, with its patriarchal structure, and civil society, with its capitalist economy, are essential pillars of ethical life. Explain this argument. Where helpful, make use of Marx’s critique of the family and civil society in order to clarify Hegel’s view. Refer to the secondary readings as well where appropriate.
Specifications:
1. The paper should be no more than 5 pages in length, typewritten, double-spaced, with 12-point type and standard 1-inch margins. You do not need a plastic cover or any special binding for the paper; a staple in the upper left corner will suffice.
2. Any standard citation procedure may be used (footnotes, endnotes, parenthetical citations). I only ask for complete clarity in citations. You are not required to use any materials other than those provided in the course, but the use of outside sources is acceptable. Resources available only on the internet may not be used, but you may certainly use internet sources that are otherwise available in hard copy form. Consult The Chicago Manual of Style (14th Edition or later) if you have doubts about the proper format for quotes, citations, etc.
3. Plagiarism is the most offensive act a writer can commit. You must never represent the work of others as your own. If you use the words of an author, you must enclose the quotation in “quotes” (or, if it’s lengthy, set if off in block form) and give a proper citation. This is true whether you quote directly or paraphrase (i.e., rewrite the work in your own words). You must also give a proper citation even if you use only the ideas of an author. If you have any questions about what constitutes plagiarism please consult the instructor.
Instances of plagiarism have been increasing of late. If you plagiarize, you will receive an “F” for the assignment and a request for disciplinary action will be submitted to University authorities. You will not be given the opportunity to rewrite the paper.
4. Every paper must have this signed statement on the title page: “I understand the rules governing plagiarism and I certify that the work contained in this paper is my own.
5. The second most offensive act an author can commit is an error in spelling, grammar, or punctuation. You must also pay close attention to syntax and readability.
Misuse of the possessive will not be tolerated: “the Court’s argument”; “Socrates’ argument.” “The peoples’ [more than one people] rights.” “The ruler’s
As mentioned above You are not required to use any materials other than those provided in the course as sources,
Here are the texts:
Texts
Immanuel Kant, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. J. Ellington (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1993).
G.W.F. Hegel, Elements of the Philosophy of Right, trans. H.B. Nisbet, ed. A. Wood (New York: Cambridge U., 1991): pp. 9-23, 157-379.
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, The Marx-Engels Reader, ed. R. Tucker (New York: Norton, 1978): 16-52, 70-93, 143-200, 302-312, 319-329, 469-500, 734-751.
Friedrich Nietzsche, On the Advantage and Disadvantage of History for Life, trans. Peter Preuss (Indianapolis: Hackett Pub Co (June 1, 1980).
Hegel and Marx