Warning: include(/home/smartonl/royalcustomessays.com/wp-content/advanced-cache.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/smartonl/royalcustomessays.com/wp-settings.php on line 95

Warning: include(): Failed opening '/home/smartonl/royalcustomessays.com/wp-content/advanced-cache.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/opt/alt/php56/usr/share/pear:/opt/alt/php56/usr/share/php') in /home/smartonl/royalcustomessays.com/wp-settings.php on line 95
Statistical Evaluation – RoyalCustomEssays

Statistical Evaluation

Financing for a public health activity
October 29, 2018
Map Collections
October 29, 2018

 

BE-3405 – Medical Device Evaluation

 

Statistical Evaluation of

Multi-function Defibrillator Electrode Bench Test Results

(due on or before 10/28/18)

 

Objectives:

  • To properly analyze and compare defibrillator electrode performance measures from three different manufacturers.
  • To evaluate electrode performance against prevailing IEC standards.
  • To reinforce the use of the appropriate statistical tools and Minitab in the analysis of experimental data.

 

Requirements:

  • Using the appropriate statistical tests and accompanying graphics, analyze the following measures of face-to-face electrode impedance in response to actual defibrillator-delivered current pulses. Specifically, answer the following:

 

  • Are there any significant differences in impedance between manufacturers?
    • Include some additional research on the clinical and technical implications of impedance.
  • Are there any significant differences in impedance between pre- and post- pacing?
    • Research and describe the effects that extended pacing could have on electrode performance.
  • Are these data in agreement and compliance with IEC 60601-2-4, section 201.108.1.2? Show how you can properly compare, present, and explain.

 

AC Large Signal Impedance (ohms)

[as determined and described in IEC 60601-2-4, ed. 3.0, 2010-12]

AED Pads Covidean Zoll
Pre-pacing Post-pacing Pre-pacing Post-pacing Pre-pacing Post-pacing
1.8
1.7
1.9
2.0
3.0
2.1
2.1
1.4
1.3
2.0
1.2
1.2
3.1
1.8
3.5
3.6
4.0
3.7
3.6
2.7
2.6
3.4
2.2
2.2
2.4

2.1

3.2

3.1

2.9

2.6

3.5

3.1

2.9

2.8

3.0

2.7

3.6

3.0

3.9

4.0

4.1

3.2

5.1

4.8

4.7

3.7

4.3

3.5

2.9

2.8

2.8

2.9

3.0

2.7

2.8

2.5

2.6

3.1

3.0

2.8

4.1

4.0

3.9

4.1

4.3

3.9

3.9

3.2

3.3

4.5

4.4

4.1

 

 

2. Hijacking Catastrophe

Watch Hijacking Catastrophe https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gjulR68dIs
AND write 2 pages Argumentative essay- What do you think about it? What is the strengths and weakness for this document?

Place Order