CMNS 323 Term Paper
Final Term Paper
Final Paper (25%)
Length: approximately 10 pages (double-spaced, 1-inch margins, standard font, not including title page, etc.)
Papers shorter than 10 pages of prose will be penalized accordingly
By the final weeks of the course (sometime around week 11), your research should be complete and you should be focusing on editing and revising your paper. Think carefully about the overall structure and argumentative strategy of your paper. More is not necessarily better. In fact, as you’re moving toward completion, you should be thinking about how you can focus more and cut down some of the prose in your paper in order maximize the rhetorical impact of the argument you are trying to make.
Points of Focus:
Additional issues to consider when preparing your final drafts include:
Rubric
Final Paper Rubric used by Sibo
Final Paper Rubric used by Sibo | ||
Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThesis/Overall Argument
High Proficiency: Thesis and purpose are clear to the reader; closely match the writing task. Proficiency: Thesis and purpose are fairly clear and match the writing task. Some Proficiency: Thesis and purpose are somewhat vague OR only loosely related to the writing task. No/Limited Proficiency: Reader cannot determine thesis & purpose OR thesis has no relation to the writing task. |
5.0 pts | |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
High Proficiency: Fully & imaginatively supports thesis & purpose. Sequence of ideas is effective. Transitions are effective. Proficiency: Organization supports thesis and purpose. Transitions are mostly appropriate. Sequence of ideas could be improved. Some Proficiency: Some signs of logical organization. May have abrupt or illogical shifts & ineffective flow of ideas. No/Limited Proficiency: Unclear organization OR organizational plan is inappropriate to thesis. No transitions. |
5.0 pts | |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting/Reasoning
High Proficiency: Substantial, logical, & concrete development of ideas. Assumptions are made explicit. Details are germane, original, and convincingly interpreted. Proficiency: Offers solid but less original reasoning. Assumptions are not always recognized or made explicit. Contains some appropriate details or examples. Some Proficiency: Offers somewhat obvious support that may be too broad. Details are too general, not interpreted, irrelevant to thesis, or inappropriately repetitive. No/Limited Proficiency: Offers simplistic, undeveloped, or cryptic support for the ideas. Inappropriate or off-topic generalizations, faulty assumptions, errors of fact. |
5.0 pts | |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitation/Use of resources
High Proficiency: Uses sources to support, extend, and inform, but not substitute writer’s own development of idea. Combines material from a variety of sources and doesn’t overuse quotes. Proficiency: Uses sources to support, extend, and inform, but not substitute writer’s own development of idea. Doesn’t overuse quotes, but may not always conform to required style manual. Some Proficiency: Uses relevant sources but lacks in variety of sources and/or the skillful combination of sources. Quotations & paraphrases may be too long and/or inconsistently referenced. No/Limited Proficiency: Neglects important sources. Overuse of quotations or paraphrase to substitute writer’s own ideas (Possibly uses source material without acknowledgement). |
5.0 pts | |
Total Points: 20.0 |