Lesson Plan
Bullying
November 16, 2018Medicine and Culture by Lynn Payer
November 16, 2018
4.1 Major Course Assign: Completing a Unit
This is a substantial assignment shared with your peers for feedback.
So while this is labeled discussion, it really is more like you are making a presentation to your peers of the work you have done so far this term. So think of this like a written class presentation. In giving feedback to your peers, also consider like you would do in a face to face situation. Give significant feedback, real advice, and expect that from your colleagues.
Taking the work you have done in previous modules, finish your unit. Organize it in 5 lessons. You can divide your lessons in a particular way that works for your work environment, or you can work with this suggestion (as given in the module introduction):
- an introduction,
- a discussion of your theoretical approach to curriculum and design
- a pre-assessment to find what learners already know,
- lessons with new concepts/skills to learn,
- opportunities for learners to practice independently and in groups,
- conclusion,
- and a way to evaluate what learners gained in the end.
Give enough detail for each lesson so that it is clear what you are doing and what students are doing in various steps. Each lesson should have at least one specific learning objective, an engaging introduction, relevant teaching, opportunity for students to practice or participate, and a meaningful closure.
Finally, be sure to cite sources for all ideas and practices that you copy or adapt for your use. It is totally great to use ideas that you have found elsewhere.
Add an annotated bibliography (APA format) at the end for at least four sources that helped you with the content or teaching of the unit. At least one source must be an article from a peer-reviewed academic journal. Each annotation needs a brief one-paragraph summary of the source and a mention of how it is useful to your unit. Also include one or two sources where you have looked at similar programs and say what you learned from examining them. (THis could be a website, a visit to a similar institution or interviewing someone who does work similar to what you are doing.
Your feedback to peers will be done in the next discussion space in a more formal way using a rubric. You will be assigned students to review formally, but please also give informal feedback in the first discussion space.
Use the feedback form for peer feedback. This is peer review, and your review will not will not impact the grade for the designer of the program. You will be graded for your review capabilities. In all of our work we do work in teams and this is to simulate this. When we build programs we rarely do so in isolation, so please be honest with your peer, it will help his or her program.
|
CRITERIA |
Standard |
Exemplary
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
| AUDIENCE ANALYSIS | Clear presentation of intended audience and adjustment to the needs of the audience. Clear that this is not a canned program that could be given to any audience.
|
. | ||
| CLEAR OBJECTIVES | Provides a well-developed analysis, reflecting logical reasoning& critical thinking. Good integration and interpretation of evidence provided.. Evaluates significance, implications, and consequences of problems to be solved by this program.
|
|||
| APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT PLAN | Identifies how learning objectives will be assessed | |||
| USE OF ADULT LEARNING THEORY | Identifies and critically discusses the use of adult learning theory to guide development of objectives. Recognizes the issues that may be represented as social justice such as class, race, gender, etc. | |||
| USE OF APPROPRIATE STRATEGIES FOR LEARNING DESIGN | Identifies and recommends the use of learning design strategies appropriate for adults | |||
| ORGANIZATION AND STRUCTURE | Organization and structure very clear and logical. Paragraphs have unity, coherence, distinct units of related ideas, logical progression of ideas.
Correctgrammar, punctuation, spelling and capitalisation. Good linking and transitions. |
|||
| PROFESSIONAL PRESENTATION | Presentation is professional, includes an executive summary or something to help the reader to navigate the document. |
|
||
| APA REFERENCING
CONVENTIONS |
References are correctly cited both in text and in reference list according to the APA. Correct conventions used for all references, reflecting attention to detail.
|
Project Presenter: Project Peer Evaluator:
NARRATIVE COMMENTS: Please provide narrative feedback on the project and any suggestions. Suggestions should be included for at least two specific categories. Also include general suggestions. (Please note, peer review is not included in grading of the project, so feel free to be direct with your peer. You as a reviewer are evaluated on your reviewing capabilities. This is a simulation of what happens in the workplace, we all have situations where we need to evaluate work in order to improve programs.)