Encyclopedia Comparison

Encyclopedia Comparison

The post has three asighnments

1:Encyclopedia Comparison

Professor comment : The most common problems I saw were students not having a clear hypothesis, not citing evidence from the primary sources/overreliance on secondary sources, providing a big pile of evidence with no explanation as to why it is important or why it supports their argument, excessive quoting and not using their own words to make their argument, issues with grammar mainly about sentence structure, and the use of an unprofessional tone. This is an academic paper, not a mystery novel—tell the reader right from the start what your argument is. What will you argue and what evidence will you bring forth to support your claims? Everything you say must be supported with evidence from the primary sources, and every piece of evidence you bring in needs an explanation as to why it supports your argument.

–

2: Write a PPAARE question and locate three or four sources of evidence. Select the highest-level, most relevant article that addresses the question to critique. You will also incorporate your evidence in your patient education material in Part 2. 2. Write a critical analysis of the article you chose using the appropriate form based on the type of article: (a) Table 11-3 for a quantitative research report; (b) Table 11-6 for a qualitative research report; or, (c) the PRISMA checklist for a systematic review or meta-analysis. An example of a critical analysis of a quantitative study using Table 11-3 is located on pages 345-351. An example of a critical analysis of a qualitative study is located on pages 353-357.

Artical Review
chose an Article Critique that have ( abstract – methods – result – conclusion )
NOTE : the topic about How to avoid the risk of heart diseases.
Purpose: To apply the best available current evidence to design a patient education material for a patient group and condition of interest.
There are two major components to this assignment: (1) Critique of an Article; and, (2) Patient Education Material.
Part I
– Select the highest level of current evidence available and relevant to a community and problem you select.
1. Write a PPAARE question and locate three or four sources of evidence. Select the highest-level, most relevant article that addresses the question to critique. You will also incorporate your evidence in your patient education material in Part 2.
2. Write a critical analysis of the article you chose using the appropriate form based on the type of article: (a) Table 11-3 for a quantitative research report; (b) Table 11-6 for a qualitative research report; or, (c) the PRISMA checklist for a systematic review or meta-analysis. An example of a critical analysis of a quantitative study using Table 11-3 is located on pages 345-351. An example of a critical analysis of a qualitative study is located on pages 353-357.
Type your critical analysis into one of the three templates provided. Upload the completed template and a PDF file of the research report on which you completed the critical analysis.
_________________________________________________
Part 2 –
1. Write four objectives for the patient education material; at least one of the objectives must be an affective objective.
2. Design a patient education material based on the criteria listed on the rubri

3:First they killed my father

read the book ” First they killed my father- A daughter of Cambodia Remembers” by Loung Ung. then, choose a moment from the text that especially interest you, and discuss it. why did you choose this moment? how does it affect your overall understanding of the story? you may interpret the idea of “a moment” as a scene, an event or sequence of events, a particular detail ,a paragraph, or even a particular sentence.

patient education