Interests and ethics of the stakeholder

post has two assignments

write an essay that addresses the following questions:
1) How do the interests and ethics of the stakeholder groups differ?
2) What ethical justification can you offer for the way you voted on the proposal?
3) Based on this experience, critically evaluate the case for green HRM. Assessment Brief and Extra notes for your guidance:

Referring to the case example brief (will be handed out in the module classes) and your experience of taking part in the classroom role play exercise, write an essay that addresses the following questions:
1) How do the interests and ethics of the stakeholder groups differ?
2) What ethical justification can you offer for the way you voted on the proposal?
3) Based on this experience, critically evaluate the case for green HRM.

To construct a great answer you need to demonstrate that you have done the following:
• Selected appropriate theories, models, concepts and topics from the module content and applied them to a discussion of ethical behaviours arising throughout the case study role play.
• Undertaken your own desk research on the issues and topics arising from the role play, and integrated your findings into the assignment (using both material on the reading list and articles, journal papers and book chapters you have found yourself).
• Have developed your own voice and ideas, supported by arguments that are backed by references to academic literature, theories and secondary research.
• Demonstrate an ability to move beyond description of an issue by applying theories that enable you to develop critical insights and establish the ‘so what?’ issues that arise.
• Demonstrate that you can widen the argument and link it to contemporary challenges within wider society. Another aspect of this could come from comparing and contrasting the case study to other examples (either for similarity or dissimilarity).

1) How do the interests and ethics of the stakeholder groups differ?

? Think about the different stakeholder groups that took part in the role play… what were their interests and ethics (e.g. self-interest, altruism, utilitarianism…. etc.. etc…)? This may have been stated at the session, in the discussions and after vote discussions that you should have been noting on the day. Or you could INTERVIEW some of your classmates to learn more about this and gain insights into what they and those in their stakeholder groups were thinking and what they said they did and why… etc.
? Look at lecture material to give you ideas and to help you identify the interests and ethics at play. Lectures 2 and 3 are of particular relevance here as lecture 2 provided a model that you can use to do this, lecture 3 provided lots of information on the different ethical bases for decision-making. Also see lecture 5 on stakeholders and managing multiple interests of course and the lecture 8 and FairShares model/approach information provided.
? Follow up on relevant readings from lectures and the readings lists to inform your understanding of these issues and stances and to provide scholarly weight to the points you make. Ensure you reference these correctly.
? Do some additional research to find relevant books and papers so you can really develop those M-Level scholarly skills and approaches.
? So, the above requires a level of engagement with the lecture material, literature base, individual thinking and judgement but also, you answer will be aided by some co-opeartive / collaborative endeavours such as discussing with your peers.
? (PLEASE NOTE THAT IF YOU WERE ONE OF THE FEW THAT MISSED THE ROLEPLAY EXERCISE then you can interview your classmates to find out what occurred on the day, what they decided on / voted on and ask about their views and stances to enable you to be able to cover this part of the assessment. You can also look at the BlackBoard site, as outlined at the start of this box of information, to see the role play exercise and voting outcomes etc. It is your responsibility to catch up on what you missed to enable you to answer these assessment questions).

2) What ethical justification can you offer for the way you voted on the proposal?

? Think about what you thought and felt and did before, during and after the role play. Reflect on this.
? What was the basis of your decision and how did you vote? How can you JUSTIFY this using ethical theory?
? Did you consider voting another way? If not why not? If so, what swayed you and what was the basis of this switch in your thinking?
? Look at lecture material to give you ideas and to help you identify your interests and ethics. Lectures 2 and 3 are of particular relevance here but you may wish to draw on material and models/theories from elsewhere in the curriculum (use your judgement). Also see the leadership lecture as in here could come notions of authentic and ethical leadership and the Pless and Maak paper referenced and covered could also help.
? Follow up on relevant readings from lectures and the readings lists to inform your understanding of these issues and stances and to provide scholarly weight to the points you make. Ensure you reference these correctly.
? Do some additional research to find relevant books and papers so you can really develop those M-Level scholarly skills and approaches.
? So, the above requires a level of engagement with the lecture material, literature base, individual thinking and judgement.
? (PLEASE NOTE THAT IF YOU WERE ONE OF THE FEW THAT MISSED THE ROLEPLAY EXERCISE then you will have to imagine you were allocated one of the stakeholder roles and decide on how you would have voted i.e. to accept the proposal or to reject it and think of reasons why and then answer the question. This will be more abstract and you will have missed the discussions and actual experience but you can answer this as an individual/desk exercise. If you also interview your classmates, as suggested above, this will go some way to enable a more robust post-role play participation on your part).

3) Based on this experience, critically evaluate the case for green HRM.
? First step may be to outline IF and if so, justify the role that HRM can/should play in the development and management of such multi-stakeholder enterprises as this case study one. (OR If you think there is no or little case for HRM taking a role in this, you must argue appropriately for this.).
? You may well then move onto providing some more detailed discussions to help you do this by selecting some key green HRM/D areas to discuss with, of course, appropriate support from literature, theory and examples. MAKE THESE RELEVANT TO THE CASE ORGANISAITON at all times and avoid general discussions. For example, what kind of employee relations would suit this organisation and support its ongoing development and management? …. How can green HRM support recruitment, training and reward etc? …… What kind of sustainability/ethical leadership would suit here and how can it be supported by the HRM/D department?….. How can performance and reward support it? Etc… Etc.
? Note that you will not be able to cover all the green HRM/D and related areas here but will have to choose to focus on a few key areas.
? Again, you will need to look at lecture material to give you ideas and to help you identify areas for discussion and how to justify the role of HRM. This could come from anywhere in the curriculum and we are implicitly assessing your choices and judgements here (as explicitly evidenced in the written material of the essay). For example, what are the models and theories from lectures that can help here to make the case for HRM before moving onto the detail of particular areas of HRM/D practice?
? Lecture on leadership regarding leadership approach and development…. Materials on governance and employee relations from lecture 8…. extra materials on the BlackBaord site….. Green HRM form lecture 7 ……etc. etc. Again, you must choose what you think can help you make your case and provide relevant and appropriate examples that relate to the case and the question and use your judgement.
? Again, follow up on relevant readings from lectures and the readings lists to inform your understanding of these issues and stances and to provide scholarly weight to the points you make. Ensure you reference these correctly.
? For this part of the essay, it is wholly relevant and appropriate to draw on relevant materials and literature from other modules that may cover the areas you are discussing or about the role of HRM/D and approaches to HRM/D etc.
? Again, you may very well wish to do some additional research to find relevant books and papers so you can really develop those M-Level scholarly skills and approaches. For example, if you wish to talk about reward strategy in more detail, you may want to expand on the materials in the lecture and reading lists
? So, the above requires a level of judgement and choice, engagement with the lecture material and literature base, individual thinking and argument.

2: Healthcare Organization Problem

Order Description

The purpose of this assignment is to (a) identify and articulate a healthcare organization problem; (b) assess all systems components of the organization problem; (c) identify the problem solution and alignment with the organization mission, vision, and values; (d) describe how the solution supports or creates organization culture and climate change; (e) apply system inputs, throughputs, outputs, cycles of events, and negative feedback related to the problem solution; and (f) identify how the problem solution aligns with professional standards.
Course Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to
(CO 1) Investigate how a systems-approach is utilized in providing patient-centered and value added care (PO 4, 6, 7)
(CO 5) Describe the concept of multidisciplinary-team collaboration, exchange of information, and coordination of patient care (PO 3, 7)
(CO 7) Identify various team strategies for problem solving that enhance patient centeredness and value-added care (PO 8, 9)
Due Date: Submit to the CCN Dropbox by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 2.
Total Points Possible: 200
REQUIREMENTS:
1. This paper will be graded on quality of paper information, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and organization based on the required components.
2. Create the review using Microsoft (MS) Word, which is the required format for all Chamberlain documents. You can tell that the document is saved as an MS Word document because it will end in .docx.
3. Submit to the appropriate CCN Dropbox by 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday of the week due. Any questions about this paper may be discussed in the weekly Q & A Discussion topic.
4. The length of the paper is to be no greater than five pages, excluding title page and reference page. Extra pages will not be read by the instructor and will not count toward your grade.
5. Please name your file using the Required File-Naming Protocol for Submission of Assignments under Policies.
6. APA format (6th edition) is required in this assignment, including a title page and a reference page. Use APA level 1 headings for the organizational structure of this assignment. Remember that the introduction does not carry a heading that labels it as a level heading in APA format. The first part of your paper is assumed to be the introduction. See the APA manual for details. See the resource under Doc Sharing, “Guidelines for Writing Professional Papers.” Use the suggested format and headings to organize your assignment:
a. Include an introduction (do not label it as a heading in APA format);
b. Problem identification
c. System Inputs, Throughputs, Outputs, Cycle of Events, and Negative Feedback
d. Problem solution
e. Summary

PREPARING THE PAPER
1. Write a clear introduction that includes the problem and the purpose.
2. Explain the organization mission, vision, values, culture, and climate related to the problem.
3. Describe the area or department problem using open systems terminology.
4. Identify the desired outcome, goals, and objectives; apply the solution, including professional standards that may be applicable.
5. Describe how the solution aligns with the organization’s mission, vision, and values. Describe how it will improve the culture and climate.
6. Summarize the main points from the body of the paper.
7. The paper will be five pages maximum, excluding title and reference pages.
Note: If you go over the maximum paper length, the information will not be graded by the instructor.
8. Title and reference page(s) must be in APA format (6th edition).
9. Use 12-point Times New Roman font and one-inch margins on all sides of the paper.

Introduction of the problem, organization description, and purpose of the paper 26 Points 23 Points 21 Points 10 Points 0 Points
Introduces the problem succinctly; purpose of paper stated clearly Introduces the problem and purpose of paper with minor lack of clarity or missing elements Introduces the problem or purpose lacking important element or specificity Introduction has multiple elements inaccurate Introduction is not present
Identification of organization mission, vision, values, culture and climate related to problem 26 Points 23 Points 21 Points 10 Points 0 Points
Identification of key organizational components is articulated clearly with no inaccuracy. Identification of key organizational components is articulated with rare inaccuracy. Identification of key organizational components lacks occasional important elements or specificity Identification of key organizational components has multiple instances of inaccuracies Identification of key organizational components is not present.
Describes the problem using systems terms of input, throughput, output, cycle of events and negative feedback 26 Points 23 Points 21 Points 10 Points 0 Points
Clearly presented problem description using systems terms correctly with no inaccuracy Clearly presented problem description using systems terms with rare inaccuracy Clearly presented problem description using systems terms lacks occasional important element or specificity Clearly presented problem description using systems terms has multiple instances of inaccuracies Clearly presented problem description using systems terms is not present.
Solution outcome goals and objectives are measurable and align with identified professional standards. 26 Points 23 Points 21 Points 10 Points 0 Points
Solution outcome goals and objectives are measurable and align with identified professional standards with no inaccuracy. Solution outcome goals and objectives are measurable and align with identified professional standards with rare inaccuracy. Solution outcome goals and objectives are measurable and align with identified professional standards lacks occasional important element or specificity Solution outcome goals and objectives are measurable and align with identified professional standards has multiple instances of inaccuracies Solution outcome goals and objectives are measurable and align with identified professional standards is not present.
Clear alignment of problem solution to organization mission, vision, values, and impact on culture & climate 26 Points 23 Points 21 Points 10 Points 0 Points
Clear alignment of problem solution to organization mission, vision, values, and impact on culture & climate with no inaccuracy Clear alignment of problem solution to organization mission, vision, values, and impact on culture & climate with rare inaccuracy. Clear alignment of problem solution to organization mission, vision, values, and impact on culture & climate lacks occasional important element or specificity Clear alignment of problem solution to organization mission, vision, values, and impact on culture & climate has multiple instances of inaccuracies Clear alignment of problem solution to organization mission, vision, values, and impact on culture & climate is not present.
Summary of content presented based on identified problem and purpose. 26 Points 23 Points 21 Points 10 Points 0 Points
Concluding statements summarizing content are present and accurate. Concluding statements summarizing content are present with rare inaccuracy or missing elements. Concluding statements summarizing content lack occasional important element or specificity. Concluding statements summarizing content has multiple instances of inaccuracies Concluding statements summarizing content are missing.
Content Subtotal _____of 156 points
Format
Possible Points = 44 Points
Text, title page, and references are consistent with APA format. 16 Points 14 Points 13 Points 6 Points 0 Points
Text, title page, and references are consistent with APA format. Text, title page, and references are consistent with APA format with 1-2 exceptions. There are 3-4 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s). There are 5 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s). There are 6 or more APA format errors in the text, title page, and reference page(s).
Ideas and information from other sources are cited correctly. 14 Points 12 Points 11 Points 6 Points 0 Points
Ideas and information from other sources are cited correctly. Ideas and information from other sources are cited correctly with 1-2 exceptions. Ideas and information from other sources are cited with 3-4 errors. Ideas and information from other sources are cited with 5 errors Ideas and information from other sources are cited with 6 or more errors.
Rules of grammar, word usage, and punctuation are followed. 14 Points 12 Points 11 Points 6 Points 0 Points
Rules of grammar, word usage, and punctuation are followed. Rules of grammar, word usage, and punctuation are followed with 1-2 exceptions. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work with 3-4 exceptions. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work with 5-6 exceptions. Rules of grammar, spelling, words usage, and punctuation are followed with 7 or more exceptions.

Healthcare Organization