post has two assignments
1: Finance modeling
Fuzzy Logic
.K.)
Project description
Coursework Assignment
It has to be about the finance modeling. And a case study approach. Using fuzzy logic methods. Fusing a fuzzy network with a fist time approach or comparing to existing approaches.
Fuzzy network vs. fuzzy system
Formatting guidelines
MS Word template for IEEE Conference Papers
Approximate length
3000 words / 6 pages
Core sections
Title
Abstract
Keywords
Introduction
Methodology
Results
Evaluation
Conclusion
References
Optional sections
Appendix
Acknowledgement
Main questions
What has been done
Why has it been done
How has it been done
Novelty contribution
Methods, e.g. theoretical algorithms, software programs
Problems, e.g. application areas, case studies
Methods and problems
Comparative performance
Quantitative, e.g. numerical figures, formal descriptions
Qualitative, e.g. verbal statements, informal descriptions
Quantitative and qualitative
Sample methods
Standard fuzzy system
Chained fuzzy system
Hierarchical fuzzy system
Networked fuzzy system
Method attributes
Feasibility
Accuracy
Efficiency
Transparency
Sample problems
Environment
Business
Medicine
Transport
Problem attributes
Nonlinearity
Uncertainty
Dimensionality
Structure
Marking criteria with maximal weights
Importance, e.g. useless, valuable (20%)
Content, e.g. derivative, original (20%)
Focus, e.g. superficial, detailed (20%)
Style, e.g. incoherent, readable (10%)
Organization, e.g. ambiguous, precise (10%)
Presentation, e.g. confusing, orderly (10%)
References, e.g. inadequate, complete (10%)
———-
use the “Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference Systems for High Frequency Financial Trading and Forecasting” file as a template. so basically, this paper i want you to do exactly the same this but with different data. you should have a comparative validation having an additional input such as stock market index; so with a stock market index and without it. also an academic novelty of using a fuzzy network with a first time approach on a case study. you can use the case study in the “Intraday high-frequency FX trading with adaptive file neuro-fuzzy inference systems”. Be more specific
2:History
A study hint: I would encourage you to construct outlines for each of the essays below that include a detailed thesis (a specific response to each of the questions) and specific evidence that you will use to back up your argument(s). All of the essay questions require you to consider: “What is the nature of Canada?” Come to the exam having already practiced a well-thought-out thesis (not only what you are going to argue but how you will argue it) and having a rough outline, it will bring coherence to your thoughts for each question. You would also do well to make specific references to historical events, places and people throughout the essay as a way of providing evidence for your arguments. You should use the lectures, GCM websites, videos, discussions, and the textbook as sources of information. Remember that you are not restricted to material covered after the mid-term (indeed, I am looking to see how you bring pre-World War One ideas and themes into the essay). Finally, you have a chance to wax philosophical in your conclusion so do take the opportunity to state some of your poignant observations making sure that they follow from the rest of the discussion in your essay. Because you have the questions ahead of time, it is my expectation that you will come to the exam PREPARED to give a fairly sophisticated and nuanced answer to each question. READ THE QUESTIONS CAREFULLY! Please remember to use specific examples from post-Confederation Canada to back up your assumptions! And, above all, have some fun with it. An important point to remember: I am not looking to trick you or to find out what you don’t know. I am interested in understanding what you have learned about Canada’s history after Confederation.
The instructions that appear on the exam are as follows:
In ESSAY format answer the question below. Remember, a good essay should have a well-constructed thesis, arguments supported by evidence, some counter-arguments (if applicable to the question) and a thoughtful conclusion.
1. It has often been claimed that Canada is a country without an established, independent character. Do you agree or disagree? If you agree, define a “positive” identity for Canada using Canadian historical developments. If you disagree make clear how Canada’s dependence on other nations has compromised its identity since 1867. Conclude by discussing Canada’s future options regarding its relations within and outside of North America.
Canadian historical