Constructivism or Behaviorism

post has three assignments

Teaching Students with Intellectual Disabilities: Constructivism or Behaviorism?

2:Statistics for Nursing Research

Use MS Word to ?om?lete “Questions to be Graded: Exercise 26” in Statistics for Nursing Research: A Workbook for Evidence-Based Practice. Submit your work in SPSS by co?ying the output and pasting into the Word document. In addition to the SPSS output, please include explanations of the results where appropriate.

Below is the 2nd and last item to be sent for Exercise 26. Textbook 1. Statistics for Nursing Research: A Workbook for Evidence-Based Practice Read Chapter 26 in Statistics for Nursing Research: A Workbook for Evidence-Based Practice. http://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/elsevier/2016/statistics-for-nursing-research_a-workbook-for-evidence-based-practice_ebook_2e.php Electronic Resource 1. Graphing Distribution Read “Graphing Distribution,” by Project Leader: David M. Lane, from Online Statistics Education: A Multimedia Course of Study. http://onlinestatbook.com/2/graphing_distributions/graphing_distributions.html 2. Introduction Read the “Introduction,” by Project Leader: David M. Lane, from Online Statistics Education: An Interactive Multimedia Course of Study. http://onlinestatbook.com/2/introduction/introduction.html 3. SPSS Tutorials Review the “SPSS Tutorials” media piece, and use it as a resource for assigned work, as applicable. http://lc.gcumedia.com/psy380/spss-tutorials/v1.1/ 4. Summarizing Distributions Read “Summarizing Distributions,” by Project Leader: David M. Lane, from Online Statistics Education: A Multimedia Course of Study. http://onlinestatbook.com/2/summarizing_distributions/summarizing_distributions.html 5. The Visual Learner: Statistics Refer to the “Visual Learner: Statistics” for examples of: Measure of Mean, Measure of Center Median, Measure of Center Mode, Range and Standard Deviation and Variance.

3: Transition to Professional Practice

Assignment 2: Individual Poster: Specialty Stream content Assessment (1600 word equivalent) submitted on line
Assessment Description: Poster Presentation This assignment requires you to create a poster (using the template provided) addressing a Question or issue from your specialty stream content. You are expected to read a wide range of peer reviewed journal articles to support your discussions, this assignment requires you to present the current researched evidence throughout your poster. Points that you need to address: • Question or Issue to be stated in the title of the poster. Your specialty stream tutor will identify the options which you can do for this assignment.
• Background- discuss the background knowledge of the question or issue, ensuring it is relevant to your specialty stream content. • Include Key Messages- Perform a literature search and identify 3 key messages which you want to present to support the importance of discussing your question or issue.
• Recommendations: • What recommendations can be made for clinical practice surrounding your question or issue? • Does it require further research? Sometimes reading through the limitations and exclusions criteria of articles helps. • Think of the ways for providing education and developing policy and procedures.
• Implementation of results: • Discuss how the literature you have reviewed, and recommendations made can be implemented in practice. Always remember to link in to your question or issue. • Based on the answers you have got from the literature are there any implications for practice? This could be positive or negative implications. Are there any disagreements between the authors or conflicting results? Is the evidence strong enough to change a practice?
Other • You may alter the template to make the poster individual • Images can be used as it will make the poster more visually appealing.
Remember to reference as per the normal university policy- Harvard Referencing, intext and reference list- don’t forget to reference any images used.

Performance standard
Assessment criteria Weighting Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Notes
Question or Issue and Background
10%
/10
Exceptional, analytical background.
Identification of the current literature to support the issue or question. 8-10
Advanced description of background and question or issue.
6.5-7.5
Clear description of background of the question or issue.
5-6
Unclear description of background linked to the question or issue.
No references used to support the introduction and background. 0-4
Key Messages
30%
/30
Exemplary analysis and discussion of the key messages from a wide range of primary research papers. High level of knowledge of the issue or question demonstrated. 24-30
Three highly applicable key messages from 4 primary or secondary research papers. Good level of knowledge presented with only small areas for improvement.
20-23.5
Description only of the three key messages from 4 primary research papers. Adequate knowledge of the researched issue/question.
15-19
Less than 3 relevant or incorrect key messages. Studies selected are not peer reviewed papers.
Student does not demonstrate an adequate knowledge of the issue/question. 0-14
Recommendations
20%
/20
Exceptional, critical and relevant recommendations based on the current evidence.
Recommendations based on research within the past 5-10 years maximum.
16-20
Clear recommendations that can be implemented into practice, further research or education.
Recommendations based on research within the past 5-10 years maximum. 13-15
Limited and basic recommendations for practice, research or education.
Recommendations based on research within the past 5-10 years maximum.
10-12
Irrelevant recommendations for practice, research or education.
Recommendations not based on current research.
0-9
Discussion/ Implementation
30%
/30
Demonstrate original thought, exceptional analysis of 4 research papers. Analysis of review outcomes demonstrates exceptional integration of relevant additional literature.
Demonstrates a high understanding of the issues in relation to the research question.
24-30
Demonstrate comprehensive critical analysis of 4 research papers. Analysis of review outcomes demonstrates high level integration of relevant additional literature, impressive.
20-23.5
Demonstrate satisfactory critical analysis of outcomes from 4 research papers. Analysis of review outcomes demonstrates adequate use of 3 relevant additional literature sources.
Descriptive level analysis.
15-19
Poor and/or unrelated analysis of 3 or less research papers. Not critical. Poor, inadequate and/or unrelated implementation of results for practice and other areas.
0-14

Poster, Writing Style and Referencing
10%
/10
Exceptional creative flair in layout; impressive use of colour.
Succinctly expresses insightful and original thought using exemplary poster presentation skills. Adheres to all writing guidelines, no grammar or spelling errors.
Excellent visual appeal, engaging the author.
Graphics draw in the reader. Template used to display discussion.
Correct referencing used throughout the entire poster- no errors. Reference list present. 8-10
Impressive creative flair in layout; fonts; use of colour. Template adjusted to create greater appeal to the reader.
Succinctly expresses ideas high impact images and poster presentation skills.
Adheres to all writing guidelines
Template used to display discussions.
Minimal grammar and spelling errors throughout the paper.
Minor errors in the referencing noted. Reference list present.
6.5-7.5
Basic layout; some problems with fonts and use of colour. Some images irrelevant Too much text. Vague, limited Inadequate lacking in clarity in some areas
Template used to display discussions.
Limited graphics and editing to engage the reader.
Clear Structure, clearly identified points for discussion.
Between 5 and 10 grammar and spelling errors however does not stop the reader.
Less than 5 errors in referencing noted. Reference list present.
5-6
Poorly presented, little appeal busy, difficult to read due to problems with font and colour. All images irrelevant No connection to question or issue. Poor logic, Sections required to meet assignment instructions deleted from template.
Poor presentation, no graphics used to enhance the poster.
Graphics used do not relate to the chosen question or issue.
Disjointed format of the Poster.
Multiple spelling and grammar issues which detracts the marker from the poster.
Incorrect referencing throughout the poster. Reference list not present.

Nursing research