Warning: include(/home/smartonl/royalcustomessays.com/wp-content/advanced-cache.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/smartonl/royalcustomessays.com/wp-settings.php on line 95

Warning: include(): Failed opening '/home/smartonl/royalcustomessays.com/wp-content/advanced-cache.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/opt/alt/php56/usr/share/pear:/opt/alt/php56/usr/share/php') in /home/smartonl/royalcustomessays.com/wp-settings.php on line 95
Inoculating Algal Cultures – RoyalCustomEssays

Inoculating Algal Cultures

Making Effective Graphs
October 29, 2018
PRODUCT AND PROCESS DESIGN
October 29, 2018


EVPP 111 Lab – Guide and Grading Rubric for Formal Lab Report – Fall 2018
8/27/18
Guide to the Formal Lab Report:
Students will complete one formal lab report. The report will be based on one activity
(experiment) conducted in lab class and completed the week of 10/1/18-10/5/18. The
activities upon which the report is based are:
“Water Quality – Activity 8 – Pollutants – Inoculating Algal Cultures”
“Water Quality – Activity 9 – Pollutants – Effects on Algal Growth”
The first activity constitutes the set up of this experiment and will be completed in lab
classes the week of 9/17/18-9/21/18 and the second activity constitutes its completion,
which will occur lab classes the week of 10/1/18-10/5/18.
The formal lab report assignment is to introduce students to the style of writing used
to present the process and results of scientific experimentation. Students will be
prepared for the task by:
1) reading the assigned lab activities in the lab manual which are structured in a
similar manner to the structure of scientific papers
2) completing the “Scientific Paper Tutorial On-Line Assignment”
3) listening to the lab instructor’s explanations of the expected content and format
of the formal lab report and the grading rubric for the assignment
4) reading the “Writing a Lab Report” section of the lab manual
5) reading and understanding the grading rubric for this assignment (included at
the end of this document)
before writing the lab report
6) taking advantage of the individual assistance available from the lab instructor
and the learning assistants
7) taking advantage of the individual assistance available at the GMU Writing
Center (see
https://masononline.gmu.edu/student-resources/writingcenter/ )
8) participating in the peer-review process in lab class
Data and observations will be made by the lab group during the execution of the
assigned lab activity, but
the formal lab report must be the independent work of each
student
. Students will submit their formal lab report electronically via the course
Blackboard page. Upon submission to Blackboard, students’ lab report will be subjected to
a plagiarism review via the SafeAssign program which is incorporated into Blackboard.
Students are
not to copy each other’s graphs, figures, tables, illustrations or any written

portion of the formal lab report. Students who engage in this activity will be
considered to be in violation of the Honor Code and will be subject to its process and
consequences. Please visit the GMU Office of Academic Integrity website at

https://oai.gmu.edu to make sure that you understand the Honor Code and the
consequences of violating it.
The minimum sanction recommended for a violation of the
Honor Code will be a zero on the assignment.
Students who are repeating this course may incorporate portions of their previous lab
report into the current lab report provided that the new data is utilized and all sections

EVPP 111 Lab – Guide and Grading Rubric for Formal Lab Report – Fall 2018
2
are adjusted accordingly. A student who chooses to utilize this approach must keep in
mind that plagiarism checking software will be able to compare the current report to
reports submitted in the past. In other words, if a student plagiarized portions of their
previously submitted report, it will be detected on the currently submitted report and will
still be considered a violation of the Honor Code.
The first version of the formal lab report will be graded via a
peer-review process
conducted during your lab class the week of 10/22/18-10/26/18. Students must print out
and bring to their lab class the week of 10/22/18-10/26/18 TWO hard copies of
their formal lab report
. If students arrive at lab class without the hard copies of their
lab report they will be permitted to go to an appropriate location on campus to retrieve or
print the hard copies
but they will be assessed the normal penalties for being tardy to
lab class
. During lab class, each student will grade the formal lab reports of two of their
classmates using the grading rubric. This means the each student will have their formal
lab report graded by two of their classmates. The purpose of the peer-review process is
to 1) provide an incentive for students to scrutinize, evaluate and understand the formal
lab report grading rubric prior to their lab instructors using the grading rubric to grade
the formal lab report, 2) give students the opportunity to learn from seeing examples of
formal lab reports of different qualities, and 3) give students the opportunity to improve
their formal lab report based on input from their peers prior to it being submitted for
grading by the lab instructor.
The grades that students receive on their formal lab report from their peers WILL
NOT COUNT TOWARD THEIR FINAL GRADE ON THE FORMAL LAB REPORT!
HOWEVER, THE PEER REVIEW PROCESS WILL BE THE ONLY OPPORTUNITY
STUDENTS WILL HAVE TO RECEIVE FEEDBACK ON THE REPORT PRIOR TO IT BEING
SUBMITTED FOR GRADING BY THEIR LAB INSTRUCTOR. The purpose of the grades
received from one’s peers is to give students a sense of the grade they might receive from
the lab instructor grading the lab report with the same grading rubric used by the peers.
Participating in the peer-review process will be worth 12 points of the 300 possible
lab points, or 4%
. Full credit for the peer-review process will be given for a student who
is present on the day of peer-review, brings two hard-copies of their formal lab report,
and reviews and grades (using the grading rubric) the formal lab reports of two peers in a
thoughtful, thorough, conscientious manner. Fully-participating students will leave their
lab class the week of 10/22/18-10/26/18 with two peer-graded copies of their formal lab
report.
Students will have two weeks to revise their formal lab report, incorporating as
appropriate the comments received and corrections suggested in the peer-review process.
Students must
submit to the folder for their lab section an electronic copy of the
formal lab report, in the form of a .doc or .docx document, to the lab portion of the
course Blackboard page by the beginning of their lab class during the week of
11/5/18-11/9/18.
NO LATE SUBMISSIONS OF THE FORMAL LAB REPORT WILL
BE ACCEPTED
. It is NOT acceptable to email your lab instructor the electronic
version of your formal lab report instead of submitting it to the submission folder
. It
is your responsibility to submit your formal lab report to the submission folder

EVPP 111 Lab – Guide and Grading Rubric for Formal Lab Report – Fall 2018
3
successfully by the due time and date. This means you are responsible for making sure
that there are no technical difficulties that will prevent you from submitting your formal
lab report in a timely manner. This may mean that you should plan on submitting the
formal lab report prior to the due date/time so that if a technical difficulty arises you will
have time to resolve it and still submit your formal lab report in on time.
The formal lab report submitted by the beginning of each student’s lab class the week
of 11/5/18-11/9/18 will be
GRADED EXTREMELY STRICTLY!!!! If students have given
due diligence to this assignment, participated fully in the peer-review process, and taken
advantage of all resources available to assist in executing this assignment, then their
grade should be satisfactory. Lab instructors will be grading the formal lab report based
on the grading rubric and utilized in the peer-review process. It is the student’s
responsibility to understand the provisions of the grading rubric.
Lab instructors will
complete the grading of the formal lab report electronically by
the beginning of each student’s lab class during the week of 12/3/18-12/7/18
. The
instructor-graded submission will be graded using the same grading rubric used to grade
the original paper during the peer-review process. The grade for the formal lab report
that is posted in the Blackboard gradebook will be a percentage grade. The final grade for
the
formal lab report will be worth 57.25 of the 300 points for lab, or 19.08% of
the lab grade.
If a student does not participate in the formal lab report peer-review process (or is
absent from lab on the day the process if conducted), they will receive a grade of 0 for
the peer-review process. They can submit the formal lab report but they will not have the
opportunity to receive feedback prior to the submission.
Format and Content Requirements
The following sections are required. Format and content requirements are summarized
below. Please refer to “writing a lab report” in the lab manual and the grading rubric for
additional detail.
General content and format information
o Font: Times New Roman
o Font size: 12 point
o Tense: Past
o Person: Not 1st
o Margins: top and bottom = 1”; left and right sides = 1.25”
o Writing style: Scientific
o Sentence structure: Extremely well-developed
o Grammar, punctuation, spelling: No more than two insignificant errors
(meaning the errors do not detract from the message or interfere with
reader’s comprehension
o Minimum length: There is no minimum length for the lab report. The goal is
to say everything that must be and should be said as concisely as possible.

EVPP 111 Lab – Guide and Grading Rubric for Formal Lab Report – Fall 2018
4
o Section headings: Should be centered on the page before the beginning of
each section. New sections do not need to begin on a new page, except that
the abstract and literature cited sections will begin on new pages.
Section-based content and format information
o Title
Content: Title must be thoroughly descriptive of the experiment (not
the assignment)
Format: Title should appear on a cover page with title mid-way down
the page, centered. At the bottom of the cover page, centered,
student’s name should appear on its own line, followed on the next line
by the name of the instructor (centered), followed on the next line by
the lab section number (centered), followed on the next line by the
date of submission.
o Abstract:
Content: A “miniature” version of the lab report that will contain
enough information about the experiment for the reader to decide
whether or not they should read the entire paper. All information
should be presented in the same order in which it will be encountered
in the lab report.
Format: Abstract will be on a page to itself following the title page
and will be single-spaced.
o Introduction:
Content: The problem or issue being studied must be described.
Background information on this problem/issue must be provided. This
requires doing some research into the problem/issue and providing a
summary of the key information. This background information should
also familiarize the reader with the topic. The source of the
background information must be cited in the body of the introduction
section. For this report, students must cite literature from three
sources in their introduction section. This section must include a
statement of the hypotheses, a description of the main objectives of
the experiment, and a brief explanation of the experimental design.
The following five general questions must be addressed/answered in
the introduction section:
what is the basic biology of the issue you are studying
why is it important
can it be disrupted by pollutants
what types of pollutants are known to adversely affect it and
why

EVPP 111 Lab – Guide and Grading Rubric for Formal Lab Report – Fall 2018
5
what are the consequences to organisms, ecosystems, the
environment of a disruption of biological process by a
pollutant(s)
Format: Will begin on its own page following the abstract. In-text
literature citations will be in APA format.
o Methods:
Content: This section should contain an explanation of the
procedures that were carried out in the experiment in sufficient
detail that someone reading the methods could repeat the
experiment, if desired. The materials used are not listed but are
mentioned only in the context of the description of their use.
Include a description of what data will be collected, when in the
experiment it will be collected and how it will be analyzed.
Format: Must be in paragraph form with no bulleted or numbered
lists. This section does not have to begin on its own page.
o Results:
Content: All main findings of the experiment, supported by key
pieces of data, should be described in paragraph form. There must
be no interpretation of data in this section. All data must be
summarized in at least one table or figure. Tables and or figures
must be labeled and numbered sequentially followed by a descriptive
title. This label/title is placed above tables and below figures.
Graphs in figures must have labels that identify the parameter and
units involved. All tables/figures must be referenced in the
paragraph portion of the section by the table/figure number.
Format: This section must not begin with a table or figure. It does
not have to begin on its own page.
o Discussion:
Content: Restate the hypotheses. Do not include any results not
mentioned in the results section. Interpret all data by explaining how
the results link to basic scientific concepts and how they link to the
findings of other researchers. Address other issues including
sources of uncertainty in the experiment, further investigations that
could/should be done to gather more information, suggestions for
improving the experiment, and an alternative explanation for positive
or negative results. State whether or not the data supported the
hypothesis and the conclusions that can be drawn from the results.
Format: This section does not have to begin on its own page.
o Literature Cited:
Content: The sources for all citations contains in the report must be
listed, in alphabetical order by author, using the APA format. A
minimum of three peer-reviewed sources must be used and the lab
manual does not count as one of those.

EVPP 111 Lab – Guide and Grading Rubric for Formal Lab Report – Fall 2018
6
Format: Use the APA format. Within a source use single-spacing and
a 0.5” hanging indent and between sources use double-spacing.
Formal Lab Report Project Timeline

Date Project Component
9/30/18, 11:59pm “Scientific Paper On-Line Tutorial” assignment – Due for
everyone by 11:59pm on 2/25/18
10/1/18-10/5/18 Pre-lab lecture includes information about the writing of
the lab report
9/17/18-9/21/18 Completion of “Water Quality – Activity 8 – Pollutants –
Inoculating Algal Cultures”,
which constitutes the set up
of the experiment that is the basis for the formal lab
report
10/1/18-10/5/18 Completion of “Water Quality – Activity 9 – Pollutants –
Effects on Algal Growth”,
which concludes the
experiment that is the basis for the formal lab report
10/22/18-10/26/18 Peer-review process occurs during lab class
11/5/18-11/9/18 Electronic submission of lab report due by beginning of lab
class
12/3/18-12/7/18 Lab instructors complete the grading of the lab report

7
Grading Rubric for the Formal Lab Report:
The following grading rubric will be used by students during the peer-review process and by lab instructors when grading the
formal lab report. Before submitting your report, you should “grade” your report for yourself using this rubric. This will enable you to
identify whether or not you have included all the required components of the report and take corrective actions prior to submission.

% of Total Section
Title = 1
1 = Title is present and all of
the following conditions met 1)
title is thoroughly descriptive
of the experiment (for
example, “Effect of Rain
Quantity and Frequency on Oak
Tree Seedling Growth”), 2)
title located on a title page, 3)
title page in correct format
0.75 = Title is present
and thoroughly
descriptive of
experiment (for
example, “Effect of Rain
on Tree Growth”) and at
least of the following
conditions are present:
1) title not on a title
page, 2) title page not in
correct format
0.5 = Title is present
but not thoroughly
descriptive of
experiment (for
example, “Effect of
Rain on Tree Growth”)
and at least of the
following conditions are
present: 1) title not on
a title page, 2) title
page not in correct
format
0.25 = Title is present but
not thoroughly descriptive
of experiment (for
example, “Effect of Rain
on Tree Growth”) and
both of the following
conditions are present: 1)
title not on a title page, 2)
title page not in correct
format
0 = No title
present
Title Section Total
Abstract = 3
0.5 = Summarizes main
concepts
of every section of
the report
0.25 = Summarizes main concepts of some sections of the
report
0= No main concepts summarized, or
abstract not present
0.5 = Information is presented in the same order
as the sections of the report are supposed to be
arranged
0.25 = Information is presented in an order that
is different from the order in which the report
sections are supposed to occur
0= Information order is
irrelevant since abstract not
present
0.5 = Length of abstract <1 page,
single-spaced
0.35 = Length of abstract is
< 1 page, double-spaced
0.25 = Length of abstract is >1 page,
single-spaced, or <1 page double-spaced
0= Length is irrelevant
since abstract not present
1.5 = Quality of abstract
would be described as
“excellent”
1.25 = Quality of
abstract would be
described as “above
average”
1.0 = Quality of abstract
would be described as
“average”
0.75 = Quality of abstract
would be described as “below
average”
0= Quality absent
since abstract not
present
Abstract Section Total

EVPP 111 Lab – Guide and Grading Rubric for Formal Lab Report – Fall 2018
8

% of Total Section
Introduction = 20
Introduction should address the following questions: 1) what is the basic biology of the issue you are studying, 2) why is it important, 3) can it be disrupted by
pollutants, 4) what types of pollutants are known to adversely affect it and why, 5) what are the consequences to organisms, ecosystems, the environment of a
disruption of biological process by a pollutant(s)
8 = Provides a general
review of peer
reviewed literature
relevant to the
experiment,
addressing all five of
the questions
6 = Provides a general
review of peer
reviewed literature
relevant to the
experiment, addressing
four of the five
questions
4.5 = Provides a
general
review of
peer-reviewed
literature
relevant to
the experiment,
addressing three of
the five questions
3.0 = Provides a
general
review of
peer-reviewed
literature
relevant to
the experiment,
addressing two of the
five questions
1.5 = Provides a
general
review of
peer-reviewed
literature
relevant to
the experiment,
addressing one of the
five questions
0 = No
review of
peer
reviewed
literature
included
1.5 = Contains
three or more
in
text literature
citations
from
peer-reviewed
sources, in APA
format
1.25 = Contains
three or more
in
text literature
citations
but they
are either not from
peer-reviewed
sources OR are not
in APA format
1.0 = Contains
two
in-text
literature
citations
from peer
reviewed
sources, in
APA format
0.75 = Contains two
in-text literature
citations
but they
are either not from
peer-reviewed
sources
OR are not
in APA format
0.5 = Contains
one
in-text
literature
citation
from a
peer-reviewed
source, in APA
format
0.25 = Contains one
in-text literature
citation
but it is
either not from a
peer-reviewed
source
OR is not in
APA format
0 = No
in-text
literature
citations
included
1.5 = Describes main objectives
of experiment thoroughly and
in a logical order
1.0 = Describes main objectives
of experiment incompletely but in
a logical order
0.5 = Describes main objectives of
experiment incompletely and in a non
logical order
0 = Main objectives of
experiment not
described
3.0 = All hypotheses
stated in the proper
format
2.25 = All hypotheses
stated but incorrect
format used
1.5 = One or more hypotheses
not included but those included
were in proper format
0.75 = One or more hypotheses
not included and those included
were in incorrect format
0 = No
hypotheses
stated
1.5 = Experimental design briefly explained 0.75 = Experimental design explanation too
extensive OR insufficient
0 = No experimental design description
provided
4.5 = Quality of
introduction described as
“excellent”
3.5 = Quality of
introduction described as
“above average”
2.5 = Quality of
introduction described as
“average”
1.5 = Quality of
introduction described as
“below average”
0 = Quality absent
since introduction
not present
Introduction Section Total

EVPP 111 Lab – Guide and Grading Rubric for Formal Lab Report – Fall 2018
9

% of Total Section
Methods = 13
6 = Concise, easy-to
follow
description of
materials and
procedures
provided in
enough detail for
experiment to be
repeated, ALL in
paragraph form
4.2 = Concise, easy-to
follow
description of
materials and procedures
provided in enough detail
for experiment to be
repeated, but all or some
was provided in bulleted
or numbered format
3.0 = Description of
materials and procedures
was either not concise and
easy to follow OR lacked
sufficient detail for
experiment to be repeated,
in paragraph form
1.8 = Description of
materials and procedures
was either not concise and
easy to follow OR lacked
sufficient detail for
experiment to be repeated,
but all or some was in
bulleted or numbered
format
0 = No description
of materials and
procedures
provided
2 = Specifically described what data
would be collected
and when in the
experiment it would collected
1 = Did not completely describe the data that would
be collected
OR did not adequately describe when in
the experiment it would be collected
0 = No description of the data that
would be collected
or when it would be
collected was provided
2 = Describes how all data will be
analyzed
1 = Describes how some data will be
analyzed
0 = No description of how data will be
analyzed
provided
3.0 = Quality of
introduction described as
“excellent”
2.25 = Quality of
introduction described as
“above average”
1.5 = Quality of
introduction described as
“average”
0.75 = Quality of
introduction described as
“below average”
0 = Quality absent
since introduction
not present
Methods Section Total

-continued
EVPP 111 Lab – Guide and Grading Rubric for Formal Lab Report – Fall 2018
10

% of Total Section
Results = 19
6 = Describes all main
findings
of
experiment and cites
all key pieces of data,
in paragraph form
5 = Describes at least ½
of
main findings of
experiment and cites at
least ½ of key pieces of
data, in paragraph form
4 = Describes all main
findings
of experiment
and cites all key pieces
of data, in non
paragraph form
3 = Describes <½ of main
findings
of experiment
and cites <½ of key
pieces of data, in
paragraph form
2 = Describes <½ of main
findings
of experiment
and cites <½ of the key
pieces of data, in non
paragraph form
0 = Main findings of
experiment were not
described and no key
pieces of data were
cited
3 = All data summarized
in at least one
table/figure
(T/F),
multiples arranged
logically and numbered
sequentially by type,
section does not begin
with T/F, all T/F are
referenced by their
number within paragraph
portion of section
2.4 = All data
summarized in at least
one table or figure
(T/F), multiples arranged
logically and numbered
sequentially by type,
section does not begin
with T/F, all T/F are
referenced in paragraph
portion of section but
not by their T/F number
1.8 = All data summarized
in at least one table or
figure
(T/F), and no more
than two of following
conditions present: not
arranged logically, not
numbered sequentially by
type, section began with
T/F, T/F not referenced
at all in paragraph portion
of section
1.2 = Part of data
summarized in at least
one table or figure
(T/F), multiples are
arranged logically and
numbered sequentially by
type, section does not
begin with T/F, all T/F
are referenced by their
number within paragraph
portion of section
0.6 = Part of data
summarized in at least one
table or figure
(T/F), and
more than two of following
conditions present: not
arranged logically, not
numbered sequentially by
type, section began with
T/F, T/F not referenced at
all in paragraph portion of
section
0 = No data
summarized
in a table or
figure
4 = Table/figure
format
: Each table has
above it a descriptive
title that begins with
“Table” followed by its
number; each figure
has below it a
descriptive title that
begins with “Figure”
followed by its number;
tables contain units in
their row/column
headings as
appropriate; figures
have on both axes
labels, units and values
3.6 = Table/figure
format
: No more
than one of the
following conditions
present: title
absent; title not
descriptive; title in
wrong place; title
doesn’t begin with
“Table..;” or
“Figure…”; units
absent in tables;
axis labels missing,
axis units missing,
axis values missing
2.8 = Table/figure
format
: More than one
but no more than three
of the following
conditions present:
title absent; title not
descriptive; title in
wrong place; title
doesn’t begin with
“Table..;” or “Figure…”;
units absent in tables;
axis labels missing,
axis units missing, axis
values missing
2 = Table/figure
format
: More than
three no more than
five of the following
conditions present:
title absent; title
not descriptive; title
in wrong place; title
doesn’t begin with
“Table..;” or
“Figure…”; units
absent in tables;
axis labels missing,
axis units missing,
axis values missing
1.2 = Table/figure
format
: More than
five but not more
than seven of
following conditions
present: title absent;
title not descriptive;
title in wrong place;
title doesn’t begin
with “Table..;” or
“Figure…”; units
absent in tables; axis
labels missing, axis
units missing, axis
values missing
0.5 = Table/figure
format
: More than
seven of following
conditions present:
title absent; title
not descriptive; title
in wrong place; title
doesn’t begin with
“Table..;” or
“Figure…”; units
absent in tables;
axis labels missing,
axis units missing,
axis values missing
0 = Table/
figure
format: No
data
summarized
in a table
or figure
3 = No data interpretation 2 = Less than two sentences devoted
to
data interpretation
1 = Three to five sentences devoted
to
data interpretation
0 = More than five sentences devoted
to
data interpretation
3 = Quality of section
described as “excellent”
2.25 = Quality of section
described as “above average”
1.5 = Quality of section
described as “average”
0.75 = Quality of section
described as “below average”
0 = Quality absent since
section not present
Results Section Total

EVPP 111 Lab – Guide and Grading Rubric for Formal Lab Report – Fall 2018
11

% of Total Section
Discussion = 28
3 = All hypotheses re
stated in the proper
format
2.25 = All hypotheses re
stated but incorrect
format used
1.5 = One or more hypotheses not
re-stated but those re-stated were
in proper format
0.75 = One or more hypotheses not re
stated and those re-stated were in
incorrect format
0 = No
hypotheses
re-stated
3 = No new results were
introduced here and no
incidences of the
reiteration of results being
presented as interpretation
of results
2.5 = No new results
introduced here but at least
one incident of the
reiteration of results being
presented as interpretation
of results
1.5 = Two new results
introduced here and/or
two incidences of the
reiteration of results
being presented as
interpretation of results
0.75 = >1<3 new results
introduced here and/or >1<3
incidences of the
reiteration of results being
presented as interpretation
of results
0 = >3 new results
introduced here and/or >3
incidences of reiteration
of results being presented
as interpretation of
results
9 =All data
interpreted
(in same
order in
which
results were
presented),
by
explaining
how findings
link to basic
scientific
concepts of
the
experiment
and how
they link to
findings of
other
researchers
7.5 =At least
¾ of
data
interpreted
(in same
order in
which results
were
presented),
by explaining
how findings
link to basic
scientific
concepts of
the
experiment
and how they
link to
findings of
other
researchers
6.5 =At least ¾ of
data interpreted
and at least one of
the following
conditions were
present:
interpretation was
not in same order
in which results
were presented;
no explanation of
how findings link
to basic scientific
concepts of the
experiment; no
explanation of how
findings link to
those of other
researchers
5.5 =At least ¾ of
data interpreted
and more than one
of the following
conditions were
present:
interpretation was
not in same order in
which results were
presented; no
explanation of how
findings link to
basic scientific
concepts of the
experiment; no
explanation of how
findings link to
those of other
researchers
4.5 = <¾>½ of
data interpreted
an at least one of
the following
conditions were
present:
interpretation
was not in same
order in which
results were
presented; no
explanation of
how findings link
to basic
scientific
concepts of the
experiment; no
explanation of
how findings link
to those of other
researchers
3.0 = <¾>½ of data
interpreted
an
more than one of
the following
conditions were
present:
interpretation was
not in same order
in which results
were presented;
no explanation of
how findings link
to basic scientific
concepts of the
experiment; no
explanation of how
findings link to
those of other
researchers
1.5 = <½ of data
interpreted
and
one or more of the
following
conditions were
present:
interpretation was
not in same order
in which results
were presented;
no explanation of
how findings link
to basic scientific
concepts of the
experiment; no
explanation of how
findings link to
those of other
researchers
0 = No data
interpreted
in context
of
explaining
how
findings
relate to
scientific
concepts of
the
experiment
and/or how
findings
relate to
those of
other
researchers

-Discussion section continued next page
EVPP 111 Lab – Guide and Grading Rubric for Formal Lab Report – Fall 2018
12

% of Total Section
Discussion = 28 – continued from previous page
5 = Addresses other issues,
including all of the following:
sources of uncertainty that may
have led to unclear results;
further investigations that
could/should be done to gather
more information; suggestions
for improving current
experiment; alternative
explanation for positive or
negative result
3.75 = Addresses other issues,
including 2 of the following 3:
sources of uncertainty that may
have led to unclear results;
further investigations that
could/should be done to gather
more information; suggestions
for improving current
experiment; alternative
explanation for positive or
negative result
1.75 = Addresses other issues,
including 1 of the following 3:
sources of uncertainty that
may have led to unclear results;
further investigations that
could/should be done to gather
more information; suggestions
for improving current
experiment; alternative
explanation for positive or
negative result
0.75 = Addresses other issues,
but none of the following were
included: sources of uncertainty
that may have led to unclear
results; further investigations
that could/should be done to
gather more information;
suggestions for improving current
experiment; alternative
explanation for positive or
negative result
0 = Did
not
address
other
issues
at
all
1.5 = States whether or
not the
data supports all
hypotheses and why/how
1 = States whether or not
the
data supports all
hypotheses, but does not
address why/how
0.75 = States whether or
not the
data supports
some hypotheses and
why/how
0.5 = States whether or not
the
data supports some
hypotheses, but does not
address why/how
0 = Does not address
whether or not the
data
supports
the hypotheses
or why/how
1.5 = All conclusions that could
be drawn from results were
clearly stated
1 = All conclusions that could
be drawn from results were
stated, but not clearly
0.75 = Some conclusions that
could be drawn from results
clearly stated
0.5 = Some conclusions that
could be drawn from results
were stated, but not clearly
0 = No
conclusions
were stated
5 = Quality of section
described as
“excellent”
4 = Quality of section
described as “above average”
3 = Quality of section
described as
“average”
2 = Quality of
section described
as “below average”
1 = Quality of
section described
as “poor”
0 = Quality absent
since section not
present
Discussion Section Total
Literature Cited = 3
1.5 = Lists at least
three sources (not
including lab manual)
in APA format
1.25 = Lists at least
three sources (not
including lab
manual) but not in
APA format
1.0 = Lists two
sources (not
including lab
manual) in APA
format
0.75 = Lists two
sources (not including
lab manual) but not in
APA format
0.5 = Lists one
source (not including
lab manual) in APA
format
0.25 = Lists one
source (not including
lab manual) but not in
APA format
0 = No
sources
listed
1.5 =All listed sources are cited
in body of report in proper
format and all in-text citations
are listed
1.0 = Only two of listed sources are
cited in body of report in proper
format and/or one in-text citation
not included in list
0.5 = Only one of listed sources cited
in body of report in proper and/or
two in-text citations are not included
in list
0 = No in-text citations of listed
sources and/or all in-test citations
absent form list
Literature Cited Section Total

EVPP 111 Lab – Guide and Grading Rubric for Formal Lab Report – Fall 2018
13

% of Total Section
General = 13
3 = Writing style: All of the
following conditions met;
written in scientific style;
correct tense (past) and person
(not 1
st) used throughout
2 = Writing style: One of the
following conditions not met;
written in scientific style;
correct tense (past) and person
(not 1
st) used throughout
1 = Writing style: Two of the
following conditions not met;
written in scientific style;
correct tense (past) and person
(not 1
st) used throughout
0 = Writing style: None of the
following conditions not met;
written in scientific style;
correct tense (past) and person
(not 1
st) used throughout
1 = All required sections are
present and each has the
appropriate section heading
0.75 =All required sections are
present and no more than one
appropriate section heading
missing
0.35 = At least one required
section
is missing, or two or
more appropriate section
headings missing
0 = Two or more required
sections
are missing, or three
or more appropriate section
headings missing
3 = Sentence structure:
Sentences 1) are extremely
well developed sentences, 2)
express ideas clearly, 3) are
concise, and 4) flow well.
2 = Sentence structure: Most
sentences 1) are extremely well
developed sentences, 2) express
ideas clearly, 3) are concise, and
4) flow well.
1 = Sentence structure: Less
than ½ of sentences 1) are
extremely well developed
sentences, 2) express ideas
clearly, 3) are concise, and 4)
flow well.
0 = Sentence structure: Sentences don’t
express ideas well and are poorly developed;
sentence structure is sometimes so poor that it
makes reading and understanding difficult;
sentences would sound strange if read out loud.
4 = Grammar, punctuation,
spelling
: Writing is nearly error
free. No more than two
insignificant errors (doesn’t
interfere with comprehension or
distract from message) in entire
paper and no significant errors
that interfere with comprehension
or distracts from message
2.5 = Grammar, punctuation,
spelling
: Writing contains <3
insignificant errors (doesn’t
interfere with comprehension or
distract from message) per page
and no more than one significant
errors that interfere with
comprehension or distracts from
message.
1 = Grammar, punctuation,
spelling
: Writing contains >3 <5
insignificant errors (doesn’t
interfere with comprehension or
distract from message) per page,
and/or more than one significant
error that interferes with
comprehension or distracts from
message
0 = Grammar, punctuation,
spelling
: Writing contains >5
insignificant errors (doesn’t
interfere with comprehension or
distract from message) per page,
and/or more than two significant
errors that interfere with
comprehension or distracts from
message
2 = Format: All of the following condition
met: typed in Times New Roman font with
size of 12 point, double-spaced (except
abstract)
1.25 = Format: Incorrect font
style or point size used, but still
double-spaced (except abstract)
0.5 = Format: typed in Times New
Roman font with size of 12 point,
but not double-spaced (except
abstract)
0 = Format: Incorrect font
style and point size used and
single-spaced throughout
General Section Total
Total (100 possible)

 

Place Order